IqNetA logo
UnEPRC
  • About
    Back

    About

    • What is IQ-Net
    • Members
    • People
    • 20th Anniversary of IQ-Net
  • Knowledge exchange
    Back

    Knowledge exchange

    • Research Papers
    • Research Papers
    • Good practice case studies
  • News & events
    Back

    News & events

    • News archive
    • IQ-Net Bulletins

    Conference ‘Regional policy in Scotland after Brexit’ – 7 February 2020,

    The 47th IQ-Net conference (Delft): Preparing for 2021-27 - Programming,

    TRACER: Research and Innovation project meeting on coal regions in transition

  • Contact us
  • Partner pages
  • Login
Login
  • Home
  • News & events
  • News archive
  • News archive
  • EPRP & BLOG: Rural policy and regional policy: similar but different

EPRP & BLOG: Rural policy and regional policy: similar but different

13 February 2020

Rural areas are increasingly in the focus of policy and many countries have taken steps to address rural issues and concerns, developing new strategies or policies. But not only is there no common understanding of what rural development policy actually is, but also its relation to regional policy is often fuzzy.  

There is no shared definition of rural development policy. In different countries, rural development policy can cover a variety of policies, some of which are defined thematically and others more territorially. In most countries, rural development policy is largely separate from regional policy and is usually integrated in agricultural policies and strongly biased towards agricultural themes. In EU countries, it is often strongly driven by EU rural policy and European funding is the most important source for explicit rural development policy.

At the same time, rural territories are also explicitly or implicitly targeted by policies that are not necessarily labelled as rural. This includes regional policy, which can be specifically directed at rural areas. Inevitably, there is a risk that boundaries between rural and regional policy become fuzzy, resulting in the need to manage their relationship.

Steps to encourage a synchronised relationship between the two policies are usually either part of spatial development or wider territorial policy concerns, or derive from EU policy requirement in the context ESI Fund delivery. They include a number of established approaches, which aim at coordination through governance arrangements, such as commissions, networks or platforms (Austria, France, Switzerland). Some more recent measures focus instead on the coherence of policy measures with rural policy objectives. Examples include overarching strategies (Poland, Switzerland), rural proofing and strengthening the rural dimension of sectoral policies (Sweden, United Kingdom), rural contracts (France) or advice to potential beneficiaries (Austria, Germany).

Yet, it appears that setting up a system for coordination or coherence between RDP and regional policy requires some form of pressure – be it from outside (e.g. EU requirements) or from inside (e.g. demands from rural stakeholders).

This blog is based on the study “Regional Policy Perspective on Rural Development Policy”  by Stefan Kah. It was undertaken for the European Regional Policy Research Consortium and was presented at the 40th Annual Conference in Scotland on 31 September – 2 October 2019. Read the full report here.

For more information, please contact stefan.kah@strath.ac.uk

×
Share this article
  • Home
  • About IQ-Net
  • Research papers
  • News & events
  • Contact us
  • Login
  • Terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Ethics & sustainability
  • Site map
  • Twitter

European Policies Research Centre Delft

BG West 270
Julianalaan 134
2628 BL Delft
Netherlands

info@eprcdelft.eu

© 2020 European Policies Research Centre